From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1466 invoked by alias); 9 Mar 2004 07:40:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1449 invoked by uid 48); 9 Mar 2004 07:40:58 -0000 Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 07:40:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040309074058.1447.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040106205426.13590.boris@kolpackov.net> References: <20040106205426.13590.boris@kolpackov.net> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/13590] [3.3/3.4/3.5 regression] Non-existing ambiguity when inhering through virtuals two identical using declarations. X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg01097.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-09 07:40 ------- We're not even convinced yet that this is a bug, so I'm postponing this until 3.4.1. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|3.4.0 |3.4.1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13590