From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7390 invoked by alias); 10 Mar 2004 16:22:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7382 invoked by uid 48); 10 Mar 2004 16:22:04 -0000 Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 16:22:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040310162204.7381.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040305002353.14438.lindsayd@cisco.com> References: <20040305002353.14438.lindsayd@cisco.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug preprocessor/14438] [3.3/3.4/3.5 Regression] -E of #pragma has negative line number X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg01231.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-10 16:22 ------- This just bit me, too. Alexandre, I strongly suspect your patches http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2003-09/msg00418.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2003-09/msg00715.html to be responsible for this. Could you please have a look? -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aoliva at redhat dot com, | |reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot | |org Known to fail|3.4.0 3.5.0 |3.3.2 3.3.3 3.4.0 3.5.0 Summary|[3.4/3.5 Regression] -E of |[3.3/3.4/3.5 Regression] -E |#pragma poison has negative |of #pragma has negative line |line number |number Target Milestone|3.4.0 |3.3.4 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14438