From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10892 invoked by alias); 10 Mar 2004 22:27:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10885 invoked by alias); 10 Mar 2004 22:27:41 -0000 Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 22:27:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040310222741.10884.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "pcarlini at suse dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030729120327.11706.rguenth@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> References: <20030729120327.11706.rguenth@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/11706] std::pow(T, int) implementation pessimizes code X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg01291.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2004-03-10 22:27 ------- Subject: Re: std::pow(T, int) implementation pessimizes code gdr at integrable-solutions dot net wrote: >The only fix that I should have applied is to make __cmath_power() >inline. > So, after all, Steven (#1) was right, why didn't you acknowldege that 6 months ago? > Any other if or #if are just papering over the fundamental >problem. That is not fix. > > Yes, your usual stance, almost *everything* is papering over for you and in the mean time you do nothing to solve the hard problems we are facing. Paolo. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11706