public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pcarlini at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/11706] std::pow(T, int) implementation pessimizes code Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 22:47:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20040310224709.17804.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20030729120327.11706.rguenth@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> ------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2004-03-10 22:47 ------- Subject: Re: std::pow(T, int) implementation pessimizes code gdr at integrable-solutions dot net wrote: >| >The only fix that I should have applied is to make __cmath_power() >| >inline. >| > >| So, after all, Steven (#1) was right, why didn't you acknowldege that 6 >| months ago? > >Because > > (1) some data was provided later, not before. > > The last data was provided December, 6th, three full months. Do you think free software implies slow feedback? > (2) It is less harm than what you'd like to do. > > I have decided nothing, I have time 'til at least the summer. >You *believe* I do not do anything. Yes, I'm not in rush into >papering over problems; but it does not mean I do nothing. > > Of course, mine was a rethorical exageration: you do "nothing" in proportion to what you could actually do, given your background and your role. Paolo. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11706
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-10 22:47 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2003-07-29 12:03 [Bug libstdc++/11706] New: " rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2003-07-29 12:39 ` [Bug libstdc++/11706] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-29 12:53 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2003-07-29 13:01 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2003-07-29 13:19 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2003-08-23 1:56 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com 2003-09-29 15:05 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2003-09-29 15:11 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2003-09-29 15:29 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2003-09-29 15:41 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2003-09-29 15:43 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2003-09-29 17:30 ` Gabriel Dos Reis 2003-09-29 17:36 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2003-11-13 21:42 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2003-12-05 23:52 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-12-06 18:26 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2003-12-06 19:26 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2003-12-06 19:50 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2003-12-06 20:05 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2003-12-06 20:33 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2004-03-10 15:14 ` pcarlini at suse dot de 2004-03-10 15:34 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2004-03-10 15:43 ` pcarlini at suse dot de 2004-03-10 19:51 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2004-03-10 20:01 ` pcarlini at suse dot de 2004-03-10 20:19 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2004-03-10 20:26 ` pcarlini at suse dot de 2004-03-10 20:43 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2004-03-10 22:27 ` pcarlini at suse dot de 2004-03-10 22:39 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2004-03-10 22:45 ` bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-03-10 22:47 ` pcarlini at suse dot de [this message] 2004-03-10 23:39 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2004-03-11 10:42 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-11 11:37 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-11 12:06 ` pcarlini at suse dot de 2004-03-11 18:55 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2004-03-11 19:04 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2004-03-11 20:14 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2004-03-12 1:43 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-05-16 22:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-23 18:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-02 4:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-02 4:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-12 16:17 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2005-02-07 22:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-10 0:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-10 1:13 ` pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-02-10 1:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-13 19:18 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-13 19:18 ` pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-05-07 19:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20040310224709.17804.qmail@sources.redhat.com \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).