From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-88785-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 20345 invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2004 21:35:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 20332 invoked by uid 48); 11 Mar 2004 21:35:16 -0000
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 21:35:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20040311213516.20331.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
From: "kazu at cs dot umass dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20040309171658.14504.stl@caltech.edu>
References: <20040309171658.14504.stl@caltech.edu>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug optimization/14504] Missed Bit Twiddling Optimization
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg01442.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From kazu at cs dot umass dot edu  2004-03-11 21:35 -------
Mainline as this is not a regression or bug fix.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14504