public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/14563] New: octave built under Cygwin very slow Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 23:36:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20040312233606.14563.paulthomas2@wanadoo.fr> (raw) I am sorry if this report is imprecise and probably unhelpful but several contributers to octave lists have failed to identify where the problem lies. The problem is simply stated and is unique to builds of octave-2.1.xx under latest version of Cygwin: interpreted octave programmes run 6-7 times slower when compiled and linked with gcc-3.3.3 and its libraries, compared with 3.2.3. Note that (i) This is problem is not present in Linux and (ii) is not dependent on which continent one is in! ie. This problem is reproducible. Beyond this, a variety of optimisation levels, architecture settings and so on were tried, to no avail. -- Summary: octave built under Cygwin very slow Product: gcc Version: 3.3.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14563
next reply other threads:[~2004-03-12 23:36 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2004-03-12 23:36 paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr [this message] 2004-03-13 7:24 ` [Bug c++/14563] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-13 8:06 ` paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2004-03-14 20:33 ` bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-03-24 9:52 ` paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2004-03-24 15:57 ` bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-03-24 16:38 ` paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2004-03-24 17:03 ` bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-03-24 21:07 ` Ben dot Diedrich at noaa dot gov 2004-03-24 22:58 ` dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net 2004-03-25 6:40 ` paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2004-03-25 13:43 ` bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-03-25 14:16 ` Ben dot Diedrich at noaa dot gov 2004-03-25 14:17 ` paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2004-03-25 14:26 ` paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2004-03-25 14:37 ` bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-03-25 15:37 ` Ben dot Diedrich at noaa dot gov 2004-03-25 16:41 ` paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2004-03-28 21:19 ` paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2004-03-28 22:28 ` pkienzle at users dot sf dot net 2004-03-31 0:21 ` paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2004-04-02 17:43 ` paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2004-04-02 19:55 ` bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-04-02 20:35 ` dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net 2004-04-02 20:41 ` pcarlini at suse dot de 2004-04-02 20:44 ` bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-04-03 9:10 ` paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2004-04-03 17:19 ` epanelelytha at kellertimo dot de 2004-04-03 17:54 ` paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2004-04-03 18:00 ` epanelelytha at kellertimo dot de 2004-04-03 18:24 ` paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2004-07-12 14:50 ` [Bug libstdc++/14563] new/delete much slower than malloc/free pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-12 19:21 ` paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2004-07-12 20:55 ` bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-07-13 4:17 ` paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2004-07-28 2:50 ` ron_hylton at hotmail dot com 2004-07-28 3:57 ` ron_hylton at hotmail dot com 2004-07-28 6:03 ` [Bug target/14563] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-29 4:23 ` ron_hylton at hotmail dot com 2004-08-08 9:24 ` paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2004-11-10 8:21 ` [Bug target/14563] [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] new/delete much slower than malloc/free because of sjlj exceptions giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-11-10 8:21 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-11-10 9:10 ` dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net 2004-11-10 12:46 ` [Bug target/14563] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-10 16:20 ` ron_hylton at hotmail dot com 2004-11-10 17:05 ` kjd at duda dot org 2004-11-13 11:03 ` paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2004-11-14 17:03 ` ken dot duda at gmail dot com 2004-11-14 18:04 ` paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2004-11-14 22:40 ` ken dot duda at gmail dot com 2005-05-12 14:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-12 14:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20040312233606.14563.paulthomas2@wanadoo.fr \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).