From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11255 invoked by alias); 13 Mar 2004 08:35:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11227 invoked by uid 48); 13 Mar 2004 08:34:58 -0000 Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 08:35:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040313083458.11226.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "bonzini at gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040306175828.14462.danglin@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20040306175828.14462.danglin@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/14462] [3.5 Regression] a-calend.adb:396:33: warning: value not in range of type "Ada.Calendar.Day_Duration" X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg01656.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From bonzini at gnu dot org 2004-03-13 08:34 ------- Apart from my name being Paolo :-) which I am slowly getting accustomed to, I would really want to add that not including function names in ChangeLogs is very annoying, especially when you did not change a ton of functions, but a single one. I really do not understand how you can set for such a quest for GCC algorithmic documentation and for the GNU coding standards, when you seem not to follow your goals for ChangeLogs at least. Just for comparison, it took me almost an hour to prepare a changelog for my RTX class patch, and I am very sorry that I missed the ada directory. I am now fairly positive that it does not cause trouble, but if it will happen six months from now, I hope that my changelog will help me and other people find the bug. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14462