From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7030 invoked by alias); 13 Mar 2004 12:35:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7021 invoked by alias); 13 Mar 2004 12:35:53 -0000 Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 12:35:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040313123553.7020.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "charlet at act-europe dot fr" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040311194333.14538.joel@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20040311194333.14538.joel@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ada/14538] *-rtems broken for gnat X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg01670.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From charlet at act-europe dot fr 2004-03-13 12:35 ------- Subject: Re: *-rtems broken for gnat > So the init.c is moving the check for rtems ahead of all these > cases where weirdness exists. I suspect that if the vxworks > code were moved up, then you could simplify those conditionals. Thaks for the hint. We'll try to have a look at it when when start building GCC 3.4 with VxWorks, since the VxWorks ports have been completely revamped in 3.4 anyway. Arno -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14538