public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/13776] [tree-ssa] Many C++ compile-time regression in 3.5-tree-ssa 040120
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 09:03:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040315090322.803.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040120183908.13776.kgardas@objectsecurity.com>
------- Additional Comments From rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2004-03-15 09:03 -------
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Many C++ compile-time regression in
3.5-tree-ssa 040120
On Mon, 14 Mar 2004, dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-14 23:14 -------
> these are my numbers when configured with just --disable-checking (with the leafify patch, etc)
The results with just --disable-checking are the same. Humm.
--disable-libunwind-exceptions should make no difference for me, as I
don't have libunwind installed - maybe it's making the difference for you?
Confused,
Richard.
--
Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at uni-tuebingen dot de>
WWW: http://www.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de/~rguenth/
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13776
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-15 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 93+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-20 18:39 [Bug c++/13776] New: Many C++ compile-time regression in 3.5-tree-ssa 040120 in comparison with 3.4.0 040114 kgardas at objectsecurity dot com
2004-01-20 18:53 ` [Bug c++/13776] " bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-01-20 18:57 ` kgardas at objectsecurity dot com
2004-01-20 19:03 ` dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
2004-01-20 19:17 ` kgardas at objectsecurity dot com
2004-01-20 19:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-20 19:42 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-01-21 23:33 ` [Bug c++/13776] [tree-ssa] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-25 21:03 ` [Bug c++/13776] [tree-ssa] Many C++ compile-time regression in 3.5-tree-ssa 040120 mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-03 15:06 ` dnovillo at redhat dot com
2004-03-03 15:39 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-03 16:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-12 14:21 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-12 23:34 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-13 2:02 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
2004-03-13 2:08 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
2004-03-13 2:08 ` dnovillo at redhat dot com
2004-03-13 2:10 ` dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-13 11:09 ` mattyt-bugzilla at tpg dot com dot au
2004-03-13 11:43 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-13 11:46 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-13 15:57 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
2004-03-13 16:00 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
2004-03-13 16:44 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-13 16:53 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-13 17:00 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
2004-03-13 17:02 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
2004-03-13 17:07 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
2004-03-14 4:47 ` dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-14 12:10 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-14 13:54 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-14 15:38 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
2004-03-14 18:00 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-14 18:22 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-14 22:21 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
2004-03-14 22:23 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
2004-03-14 22:28 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-14 22:52 ` dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-14 23:14 ` dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-14 23:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-15 9:03 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de [this message]
2004-03-24 17:16 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-03-24 18:32 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-03-28 7:38 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-28 18:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-29 2:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-29 12:14 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-31 19:33 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-31 19:37 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-31 19:53 ` zack at codesourcery dot com
2004-03-31 20:01 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-31 20:44 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-04 12:45 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-10 14:58 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-04-10 15:32 ` Diego Novillo
2004-04-10 15:33 ` dnovillo at redhat dot com
2004-04-10 15:36 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-04-10 16:10 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-04-10 16:20 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-05-17 15:59 ` [Bug tree-optimization/13776] [3.5 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-07 18:13 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-09 23:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-29 21:12 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-30 3:15 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-07-08 18:16 ` kgardas at objectsecurity dot com
2004-08-30 1:40 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-08-31 9:15 ` kgardas at objectsecurity dot com
2004-10-23 21:26 ` [Bug tree-optimization/13776] [4.0 Regression] [tree-ssa] Many C++ compile-time regression in 4.0-tree-ssa 040120 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-25 12:03 ` kgardas at objectsecurity dot com
2004-10-25 13:02 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-10-25 13:20 ` kgardas at objectsecurity dot com
2004-11-16 1:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-11-18 21:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-11-19 11:15 ` kgardas at objectsecurity dot com
2004-11-19 18:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-11-29 19:56 ` kgardas at objectsecurity dot com
2004-11-29 20:05 ` law at redhat dot com
2004-11-29 21:04 ` kgardas at objectsecurity dot com
2004-12-13 3:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-13 6:38 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-13 6:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-12-28 21:03 ` [Bug middle-end/13776] [4.0 Regression] " kgardas at objectsecurity dot com
2005-01-26 10:21 ` [Bug middle-end/13776] [4.0 Regression] Many C++ compile-time regressions for MICO's ORB code steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-26 10:25 ` kgardas at objectsecurity dot com
2005-01-26 10:25 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2005-01-26 10:46 ` kgardas at objectsecurity dot com
2005-01-26 11:36 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-27 5:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-31 9:31 ` kgardas at objectsecurity dot com
2005-02-01 13:39 ` arend dot bayer at web dot de
2005-03-02 20:09 ` [Bug middle-end/13776] [4.0/4.1 " kgardas at objectsecurity dot com
2005-03-02 21:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-03-02 21:32 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040315090322.803.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).