* [Bug libstdc++/14579] [tree-ssa regression] miscompiles POOMA testcase
2004-03-15 12:48 [Bug libstdc++/14579] New: [tree-ssa regression] miscompiles POOMA testcase rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
@ 2004-03-15 13:14 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-15 14:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de @ 2004-03-15 13:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2004-03-15 13:13 -------
Reverting
2004-03-08 Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>
* include/bits/allocator.h: Switch defaults to mt_alloc.
in the branch fixes the problem. Seems the mt allocator is buggy.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14579
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/14579] [tree-ssa regression] miscompiles POOMA testcase
2004-03-15 12:48 [Bug libstdc++/14579] New: [tree-ssa regression] miscompiles POOMA testcase rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-15 13:14 ` [Bug libstdc++/14579] " rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
@ 2004-03-15 14:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-15 16:51 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
` (10 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-03-15 14:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-15 14:17 -------
Can you try the mainline as the MT allocator has been fixed on the mainline.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14579
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/14579] [tree-ssa regression] miscompiles POOMA testcase
2004-03-15 12:48 [Bug libstdc++/14579] New: [tree-ssa regression] miscompiles POOMA testcase rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-15 13:14 ` [Bug libstdc++/14579] " rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-15 14:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-03-15 16:51 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-15 16:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de @ 2004-03-15 16:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2004-03-15 16:51 -------
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa regression] miscompiles POOMA
testcase
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-15 14:17 -------
> Can you try the mainline as the MT allocator has been fixed on the mainline.
I can't because of
bellatrix:/tmp$ ~/ix86/gcc3.5/bin/g++ -O2 -ftime-report -o tramp3d-v2 tramp3d-v2.cpp -fno-exceptions -static
tramp3d-v2.cpp: In member function `typename DT::AskDomain_t
DomainBase<DT>::firsts() const':
tramp3d-v2.cpp:3290: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
which is PR14545.
Richard.
--
Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at uni-tuebingen dot de>
WWW: http://www.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de/~rguenth/
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14579
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/14579] [tree-ssa regression] miscompiles POOMA testcase
2004-03-15 12:48 [Bug libstdc++/14579] New: [tree-ssa regression] miscompiles POOMA testcase rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-03-15 16:51 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
@ 2004-03-15 16:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-19 11:42 ` [Bug libstdc++/14579] [tree-ssa regression] [merge?] " giovannibajo at libero dot it
` (8 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-03-15 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-15 16:56 -------
Ok, then this will break anyways when the mainline gets merged into the tree-ssa. So lets just change
this to NEW for now and wait for PR 14545 to be fixed.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |14545
Status|WAITING |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-03-15 16:56:38
date| |
Target Milestone|--- |tree-ssa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14579
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/14579] [tree-ssa regression] [merge?] miscompiles POOMA testcase
2004-03-15 12:48 [Bug libstdc++/14579] New: [tree-ssa regression] miscompiles POOMA testcase rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2004-03-15 16:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-03-19 11:42 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-03-19 14:59 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
` (7 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: giovannibajo at libero dot it @ 2004-03-19 11:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
Bug 14579 depends on bug 14545, which changed state.
Bug 14545 Summary: [3.4/3.5 Regression] Cannot compile pooma-gcc (regression)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14545
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14579
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/14579] [tree-ssa regression] [merge?] miscompiles POOMA testcase
2004-03-15 12:48 [Bug libstdc++/14579] New: [tree-ssa regression] miscompiles POOMA testcase rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2004-03-19 11:42 ` [Bug libstdc++/14579] [tree-ssa regression] [merge?] " giovannibajo at libero dot it
@ 2004-03-19 14:59 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-03-19 16:01 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
` (6 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: giovannibajo at libero dot it @ 2004-03-19 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-03-19 14:59 -------
Richard, I just fixed PR 14545. If you pull a new mainline version, you can try
compiling on mainline which should have the fixed MT allocator.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |giovannibajo at libero dot
| |it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14579
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/14579] [tree-ssa regression] [merge?] miscompiles POOMA testcase
2004-03-15 12:48 [Bug libstdc++/14579] New: [tree-ssa regression] miscompiles POOMA testcase rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2004-03-19 14:59 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
@ 2004-03-19 16:01 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-19 16:18 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
` (5 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de @ 2004-03-19 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2004-03-19 16:01 -------
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa regression] [merge?] miscompiles
POOMA testcase
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, giovannibajo at libero dot it wrote:
>
> ------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-03-19 14:59 -------
> Richard, I just fixed PR 14545. If you pull a new mainline version, you can try
> compiling on mainline which should have the fixed MT allocator.
Did. But I can't say if it's fixed, as it seems to use the new_allocator,
not the mt_allocator. Configuring with
--enable-languages="c,c++" --enable-threads=posix --enable-__cxa_atexit
--disable-checking
Richard.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14579
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/14579] [tree-ssa regression] [merge?] miscompiles POOMA testcase
2004-03-15 12:48 [Bug libstdc++/14579] New: [tree-ssa regression] miscompiles POOMA testcase rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2004-03-19 16:01 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
@ 2004-03-19 16:18 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2004-03-19 16:19 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
` (4 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pcarlini at suse dot de @ 2004-03-19 16:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2004-03-19 16:18 -------
Hi. If you want to experiment with the mt_allocator just pass to configure
--enable-libstdcxx-allocator=mt
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14579
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/14579] [tree-ssa regression] [merge?] miscompiles POOMA testcase
2004-03-15 12:48 [Bug libstdc++/14579] New: [tree-ssa regression] miscompiles POOMA testcase rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2004-03-19 16:18 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
@ 2004-03-19 16:19 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-19 16:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de @ 2004-03-19 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2004-03-19 16:19 -------
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa regression] [merge?] miscompiles
POOMA testcase
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, pcarlini at suse dot de wrote:
>
> ------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2004-03-19 16:18 -------
> Hi. If you want to experiment with the mt_allocator just pass to configure
> --enable-libstdcxx-allocator=mt
What's the difference? Correctness or optimization?
--
Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at uni-tuebingen dot de>
WWW: http://www.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de/~rguenth/
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14579
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/14579] [tree-ssa regression] [merge?] miscompiles POOMA testcase
2004-03-15 12:48 [Bug libstdc++/14579] New: [tree-ssa regression] miscompiles POOMA testcase rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2004-03-19 16:19 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
@ 2004-03-19 16:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-27 20:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-03-19 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-19 16:31 -------
The different is that the mt allocator is more suited for threaded apps than the "new" allocator is.
Suited meaning it is optimized for that case.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14579
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/14579] [tree-ssa regression] [merge?] miscompiles POOMA testcase
2004-03-15 12:48 [Bug libstdc++/14579] New: [tree-ssa regression] miscompiles POOMA testcase rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2004-03-19 16:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-03-27 20:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-27 23:15 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-28 7:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-03-27 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-27 20:35 -------
Does this now work on the tree-ssa after the latested merge?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14579
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/14579] [tree-ssa regression] [merge?] miscompiles POOMA testcase
2004-03-15 12:48 [Bug libstdc++/14579] New: [tree-ssa regression] miscompiles POOMA testcase rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2004-03-27 20:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-03-27 23:15 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-28 7:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de @ 2004-03-27 23:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2004-03-27 23:15 -------
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa regression] [merge?] miscompiles
POOMA testcase
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-27 20:35 -------
> Does this now work on the tree-ssa after the latested merge?
Yes, thanks.
Richard.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14579
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/14579] [tree-ssa regression] [merge?] miscompiles POOMA testcase
2004-03-15 12:48 [Bug libstdc++/14579] New: [tree-ssa regression] miscompiles POOMA testcase rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2004-03-27 23:15 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
@ 2004-03-28 7:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-03-28 7:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-28 07:33 -------
Closing as fixed.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14579
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread