From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25590 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2004 16:23:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25572 invoked by uid 48); 16 Mar 2004 16:23:27 -0000 Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:23:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040316162327.25571.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20031030183500.12845.danglin@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20031030183500.12845.danglin@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug optimization/12845] [3.4/3.5 Regression] missed jump optimization X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg01980.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-16 16:23 ------- I've postponed this until 3.4.1; it's not a showstopper. Roger, do you have any insight into this problem? -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|3.4.0 |3.4.1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12845