public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "bruno at clisp dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug optimization/6585] Redundant store/load instruction pairs on ix86 Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 12:10:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20040317121030.26166.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20020506130600.6585.bruno@clisp.org> ------- Additional Comments From bruno at clisp dot org 2004-03-17 12:10 ------- This result is much better, indeed. Still there is room for two more optimizations: 1) The final "movl %ebx, %edx" instruction could be removed if the preceding lea instruction would write its results into %edx, not into %ebx. 2) Storing a0 and a1 in temporary stack locations is useless since a0 and a1 already come from the stack, and data analysis could find out that they are read-only. Commented listing: mul: subl $20, %esp movl %esi, 12(%esp) ; save %esi movl 24(%esp), %eax a0 movl 32(%esp), %esi b0 movl 28(%esp), %ecx a1 movl %edi, 16(%esp) ; save %edi movl 36(%esp), %edi b1 movl %eax, (%esp) USELESS! Use 24(%esp) instead mull %esi %edx:%eax := a0*b0 movl %ecx, 4(%esp) USELESS! Use 28(%esp) instead movl %ebx, 8(%esp) ; save %ebx movl %eax, %ecx movl (%esp), %eax imull %eax, %edi a0*b1 movl 4(%esp), %eax imull %esi, %eax a1*b0 movl 12(%esp), %esi ; restore %esi leal (%edx,%edi), %edi hi+a0*b1 leal (%edi,%eax), %ebx hi+a0*b1+a1*b0 COULD BE SIMPLIFIED movl 16(%esp), %edi ; restore %edi movl %ecx, %eax lo movl %ebx, %edx USELESS! movl 8(%esp), %ebx ; restore %ebx addl $20, %esp ret -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6585
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-17 12:10 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top [not found] <20020506130600.6585.bruno@clisp.org> 2003-07-04 11:09 ` [Bug optimization/6585] useless memory store instructions on x86 steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-10 20:09 ` [Bug optimization/6585] Reduntant store/load instruction pairs on ix86 steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-08-23 1:38 ` [Bug optimization/6585] Redundant " dhazeghi at yahoo dot com 2003-11-25 7:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-17 8:03 ` kazu at cs dot umass dot edu 2004-03-17 12:10 ` bruno at clisp dot org [this message] 2004-10-11 2:57 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/6585] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 11:55 ` bruno at clisp dot org 2005-06-26 13:35 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-27 11:50 ` bruno at clisp dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20040317121030.26166.qmail@sources.redhat.com \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).