From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17396 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2004 00:56:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17389 invoked by uid 48); 18 Mar 2004 00:56:05 -0000 Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 00:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040318005605.17388.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "drepper at redhat dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040318004529.14625.drepper@redhat.com> References: <20040318004529.14625.drepper@redhat.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug optimization/14625] tail call optimization missed X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg02159.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From drepper at redhat dot com 2004-03-18 00:56 ------- The current 2.5 tree-ssa tree behaves the same. My guess this is simply the check for the number of parameters of the calling functions and the called function not taking stdcall into account. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14625