From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15715 invoked by alias); 19 Mar 2004 15:56:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15692 invoked by uid 48); 19 Mar 2004 15:56:12 -0000 Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040319155612.15689.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040307221314.14470.lvoge@cs.vu.nl> References: <20040307221314.14470.lvoge@cs.vu.nl> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/14470] [tree-ssa] trouble with post-increment X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg02354.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-19 15:56 ------- Eric, Your patch is causing massive code size explosion on some files. For example, in CSiBE gsm/gsm_encode.o on ARM -Os explodes from 1396 to 3172 bytes (a 125% code size increase!). I really think we need to find a better solution than this. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14470