public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libstdc++/14579] New: [tree-ssa regression] miscompiles POOMA testcase
@ 2004-03-15 12:48 rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-15 13:14 ` [Bug libstdc++/14579] " rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
` (12 more replies)
0 siblings, 13 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de @ 2004-03-15 12:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
The tramp3d-v2 testcase (attachment see PR14408) gets miscompiled by tree-ssa.
Compiling with
g++-ssa -O0 -o tramp3d-v2 tramp3d-v2.cpp -Dleafify=fooblah -static
the testcase segfaults on start with gdb backtrace:
(gdb) run
Starting program: /tmp/tramp3d-v2
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x0808e345 in __gnu_cxx::__mt_alloc<Loc<1> >::allocate(unsigned, void const*) (
this=0xbfffe978, __n=0)
at
/net/bellatrix/home/rguenth/ix86/gccssa-150304/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.5-tree-ssa/../../../../include/c++/3.5-tree-ssa/ext/mt_allocator.h:408
408 block->next = (block_record*)((char*)block +
(gdb) bt
#0 0x0808e345 in __gnu_cxx::__mt_alloc<Loc<1> >::allocate(unsigned, void const*) (
this=0xbfffe978, __n=0)
at
/net/bellatrix/home/rguenth/ix86/gccssa-150304/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.5-tree-ssa/../../../../include/c++/3.5-tree-ssa/ext/mt_allocator.h:408
#1 0x0807db6c in __gnu_norm::_Vector_base<Loc<1>, std::allocator<Loc<1> >
>::_M_allocate(unsigned) (this=0xbfffe978, __n=0)
at
/net/bellatrix/home/rguenth/ix86/gccssa-150304/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.5-tree-ssa/../../../../include/c++/3.5-tree-ssa/bits/stl_vector.h:106
#2 0x080701fc in _Vector_base (this=0xbfffe978, __n=0, __a=@0xbfffe800)
at
/net/bellatrix/home/rguenth/ix86/gccssa-150304/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.5-tree-ssa/../../../../include/c++/3.5-tree-ssa/bits/stl_vector.h:91
#3 0x0807c704 in vector (this=0xbfffe978, __n=0)
at
/net/bellatrix/home/rguenth/ix86/gccssa-150304/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.5-tree-ssa/../../../../include/c++/3.5-tree-ssa/bits/stl_vector.h:202
#4 0x0806e605 in Centering (this=0xbfffe970, cent=CellType, cont=Continuous)
at tramp3d-v2.cpp:5599
#5 0x08059cad in CanonicalCentering (this=0x8148cc1) at tramp3d-v2.cpp:5817
#6 0x0805673d in __static_initialization_and_destruction_0 (__initialize_p=1,
__priority=65535) at tramp3d-v2.cpp:6056
#7 0x08057eb4 in _GLOBAL__I__Z22findLeftCommonEndpointiiiiiiRi () at
tramp3d-v2.cpp:56688
#8 0x081421c5 in __do_global_ctors_aux ()
#9 0x08049459 in _init ()
#10 0x0814213c in __libc_csu_init () at elf-init.c:60
#11 0x4013b88f in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6
(gdb) print block
$3 = (block_record *) 0x814affe
(gdb) print *block
Cannot access memory at address 0x814affe
This is a regression from at least (works)
g++ (GCC) 3.5-tree-ssa 20040303 (merged 20040227)
occuring no later than (fails)
g++ (GCC) 3.5-tree-ssa 20040311 (merged 20040307)
(I don't have intermediate versions to check)
and still with (fails)
g++-ssa (GCC) 3.5-tree-ssa 20040315 (merged 20040307)
I don't know if this is really libstdc++ or rather optimization (but -O0), also
I didn't check mainline, but
2004-03-08 Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>
* include/bits/allocator.h: Switch defaults to mt_alloc.
2004-03-06 Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>
* include/ext/mt_allocator.h (_S_initialize): If
!__GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT, then initialize _S_thread_freelist_mutex.
2004-03-06 Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>
PR libstdc++/12658
* src/locale_init.cc (locale::locale): Lock critical regions with
external mutexes.
(locale::global): Same.
* include/bits/concurrence.h (__glibcxx_mutex_define_initialized):
Add in once bits for cases without __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT.
(__glibcxx_mutex_lock): Same.
* config/cpu/generic/atomicity.h: Remove
_GLIBCXX_NEED_GENERIC_MUTEX, use concurrence.h.
* src/misc-inst.cc: Move all locking bits out of this file.
* config/os/hpux/os_defines.h: Remove _GLIBCXX_INST_ATOMICITY_LOCK.
* src/misc-inst.cc: Same.
* config/cpu/hppa/atomicity.h: Same.
* config/linker-map.gnu: Remove types in the signature of atomic
exports, as they may vary.
look related (so bkoz@ CCed).
--
Summary: [tree-ssa regression] miscompiles POOMA testcase
Product: gcc
Version: tree-ssa
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
CC: bkoz at redhat dot com,gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14579
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/14579] [tree-ssa regression] miscompiles POOMA testcase
2004-03-15 12:48 [Bug libstdc++/14579] New: [tree-ssa regression] miscompiles POOMA testcase rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
@ 2004-03-15 13:14 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-15 14:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de @ 2004-03-15 13:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2004-03-15 13:13 -------
Reverting
2004-03-08 Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>
* include/bits/allocator.h: Switch defaults to mt_alloc.
in the branch fixes the problem. Seems the mt allocator is buggy.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14579
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/14579] [tree-ssa regression] miscompiles POOMA testcase
2004-03-15 12:48 [Bug libstdc++/14579] New: [tree-ssa regression] miscompiles POOMA testcase rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-15 13:14 ` [Bug libstdc++/14579] " rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
@ 2004-03-15 14:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-15 16:51 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
` (10 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-03-15 14:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-15 14:17 -------
Can you try the mainline as the MT allocator has been fixed on the mainline.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14579
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/14579] [tree-ssa regression] miscompiles POOMA testcase
2004-03-15 12:48 [Bug libstdc++/14579] New: [tree-ssa regression] miscompiles POOMA testcase rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-15 13:14 ` [Bug libstdc++/14579] " rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-15 14:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-03-15 16:51 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-15 16:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de @ 2004-03-15 16:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2004-03-15 16:51 -------
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa regression] miscompiles POOMA
testcase
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-15 14:17 -------
> Can you try the mainline as the MT allocator has been fixed on the mainline.
I can't because of
bellatrix:/tmp$ ~/ix86/gcc3.5/bin/g++ -O2 -ftime-report -o tramp3d-v2 tramp3d-v2.cpp -fno-exceptions -static
tramp3d-v2.cpp: In member function `typename DT::AskDomain_t
DomainBase<DT>::firsts() const':
tramp3d-v2.cpp:3290: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
which is PR14545.
Richard.
--
Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at uni-tuebingen dot de>
WWW: http://www.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de/~rguenth/
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14579
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/14579] [tree-ssa regression] miscompiles POOMA testcase
2004-03-15 12:48 [Bug libstdc++/14579] New: [tree-ssa regression] miscompiles POOMA testcase rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-03-15 16:51 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
@ 2004-03-15 16:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-19 11:42 ` [Bug libstdc++/14579] [tree-ssa regression] [merge?] " giovannibajo at libero dot it
` (8 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-03-15 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-15 16:56 -------
Ok, then this will break anyways when the mainline gets merged into the tree-ssa. So lets just change
this to NEW for now and wait for PR 14545 to be fixed.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |14545
Status|WAITING |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-03-15 16:56:38
date| |
Target Milestone|--- |tree-ssa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14579
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/14579] [tree-ssa regression] [merge?] miscompiles POOMA testcase
2004-03-15 12:48 [Bug libstdc++/14579] New: [tree-ssa regression] miscompiles POOMA testcase rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2004-03-15 16:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-03-19 11:42 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-03-19 14:59 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
` (7 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: giovannibajo at libero dot it @ 2004-03-19 11:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
Bug 14579 depends on bug 14545, which changed state.
Bug 14545 Summary: [3.4/3.5 Regression] Cannot compile pooma-gcc (regression)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14545
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14579
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/14579] [tree-ssa regression] [merge?] miscompiles POOMA testcase
2004-03-15 12:48 [Bug libstdc++/14579] New: [tree-ssa regression] miscompiles POOMA testcase rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2004-03-19 11:42 ` [Bug libstdc++/14579] [tree-ssa regression] [merge?] " giovannibajo at libero dot it
@ 2004-03-19 14:59 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-03-19 16:01 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
` (6 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: giovannibajo at libero dot it @ 2004-03-19 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-03-19 14:59 -------
Richard, I just fixed PR 14545. If you pull a new mainline version, you can try
compiling on mainline which should have the fixed MT allocator.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |giovannibajo at libero dot
| |it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14579
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/14579] [tree-ssa regression] [merge?] miscompiles POOMA testcase
2004-03-15 12:48 [Bug libstdc++/14579] New: [tree-ssa regression] miscompiles POOMA testcase rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2004-03-19 14:59 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
@ 2004-03-19 16:01 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-19 16:18 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
` (5 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de @ 2004-03-19 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2004-03-19 16:01 -------
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa regression] [merge?] miscompiles
POOMA testcase
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, giovannibajo at libero dot it wrote:
>
> ------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-03-19 14:59 -------
> Richard, I just fixed PR 14545. If you pull a new mainline version, you can try
> compiling on mainline which should have the fixed MT allocator.
Did. But I can't say if it's fixed, as it seems to use the new_allocator,
not the mt_allocator. Configuring with
--enable-languages="c,c++" --enable-threads=posix --enable-__cxa_atexit
--disable-checking
Richard.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14579
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/14579] [tree-ssa regression] [merge?] miscompiles POOMA testcase
2004-03-15 12:48 [Bug libstdc++/14579] New: [tree-ssa regression] miscompiles POOMA testcase rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2004-03-19 16:01 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
@ 2004-03-19 16:18 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2004-03-19 16:19 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
` (4 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pcarlini at suse dot de @ 2004-03-19 16:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2004-03-19 16:18 -------
Hi. If you want to experiment with the mt_allocator just pass to configure
--enable-libstdcxx-allocator=mt
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14579
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/14579] [tree-ssa regression] [merge?] miscompiles POOMA testcase
2004-03-15 12:48 [Bug libstdc++/14579] New: [tree-ssa regression] miscompiles POOMA testcase rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2004-03-19 16:18 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
@ 2004-03-19 16:19 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-19 16:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de @ 2004-03-19 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2004-03-19 16:19 -------
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa regression] [merge?] miscompiles
POOMA testcase
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, pcarlini at suse dot de wrote:
>
> ------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2004-03-19 16:18 -------
> Hi. If you want to experiment with the mt_allocator just pass to configure
> --enable-libstdcxx-allocator=mt
What's the difference? Correctness or optimization?
--
Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at uni-tuebingen dot de>
WWW: http://www.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de/~rguenth/
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14579
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/14579] [tree-ssa regression] [merge?] miscompiles POOMA testcase
2004-03-15 12:48 [Bug libstdc++/14579] New: [tree-ssa regression] miscompiles POOMA testcase rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2004-03-19 16:19 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
@ 2004-03-19 16:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-27 20:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-03-19 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-19 16:31 -------
The different is that the mt allocator is more suited for threaded apps than the "new" allocator is.
Suited meaning it is optimized for that case.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14579
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/14579] [tree-ssa regression] [merge?] miscompiles POOMA testcase
2004-03-15 12:48 [Bug libstdc++/14579] New: [tree-ssa regression] miscompiles POOMA testcase rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2004-03-19 16:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-03-27 20:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-27 23:15 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-28 7:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-03-27 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-27 20:35 -------
Does this now work on the tree-ssa after the latested merge?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14579
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/14579] [tree-ssa regression] [merge?] miscompiles POOMA testcase
2004-03-15 12:48 [Bug libstdc++/14579] New: [tree-ssa regression] miscompiles POOMA testcase rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2004-03-27 20:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-03-27 23:15 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-28 7:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de @ 2004-03-27 23:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2004-03-27 23:15 -------
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa regression] [merge?] miscompiles
POOMA testcase
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-27 20:35 -------
> Does this now work on the tree-ssa after the latested merge?
Yes, thanks.
Richard.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14579
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/14579] [tree-ssa regression] [merge?] miscompiles POOMA testcase
2004-03-15 12:48 [Bug libstdc++/14579] New: [tree-ssa regression] miscompiles POOMA testcase rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2004-03-27 23:15 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
@ 2004-03-28 7:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-03-28 7:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-28 07:33 -------
Closing as fixed.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14579
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-03-28 7:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-03-15 12:48 [Bug libstdc++/14579] New: [tree-ssa regression] miscompiles POOMA testcase rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-15 13:14 ` [Bug libstdc++/14579] " rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-15 14:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-15 16:51 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-15 16:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-19 11:42 ` [Bug libstdc++/14579] [tree-ssa regression] [merge?] " giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-03-19 14:59 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-03-19 16:01 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-19 16:18 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2004-03-19 16:19 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-19 16:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-27 20:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-27 23:15 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-03-28 7:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).