From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13210 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2004 02:20:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13189 invoked by uid 48); 20 Mar 2004 02:20:16 -0000 Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 02:20:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040320022016.13188.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040317085213.14616.schmid@snake.iap.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> References: <20040317085213.14616.schmid@snake.iap.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/14616] [3.4/3.5 regression] disjoint_set_test.cpp from boost does not compile (sizeof) X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg02439.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-20 02:20 ------- Givoanni, do you remember what regressions this patch caused? It looks like the right idea to me, and I'm testing a variant of it now... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14616