From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15374 invoked by alias); 23 Mar 2004 14:09:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15367 invoked by alias); 23 Mar 2004 14:09:45 -0000 Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 14:09:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040323140945.15366.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040323124314.14690.rguenth@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> References: <20040323124314.14690.rguenth@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug optimization/14690] [3.4 regression] Miscompiled POOMA tests X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg02747.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2004-03-23 14:09 ------- Subject: Re: [3.4 regression] Miscompiled POOMA tests On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, bangerth at dealii dot org wrote: > > ------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-03-23 13:57 ------- > Some kind of testcase will be necessary, but it would be a great help > if you could already try to sizzle it down a little bit. POOMA testcases > are not really our favorites due to their size and complexity, and as > you are well aware of, have frequently been sitting around a while until > someone felt an urge to reduce them :-( > > W. Ok, I thought I just build and verify g++-3.4 (GCC) 3.4.0 20040323 (prerelease), and the failure still occours. It doesn't occour on ia64-linux though (same compiler). I'll try to spend some time reducing the failure myself. Richard. -- Richard Guenther WWW: http://www.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de/~rguenth/ -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14690