From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-90093-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 25581 invoked by alias); 23 Mar 2004 14:28:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 25549 invoked by alias); 23 Mar 2004 14:28:29 -0000
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 14:28:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20040323142829.25546.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
From: "law at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20040322193838.14682.aj@gcc.gnu.org>
References: <20040322193838.14682.aj@gcc.gnu.org>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug optimization/14682] [tree-ssa] error: Invalid operand to binary operator
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg02750.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From law at redhat dot com  2004-03-23 14:28 -------
Subject: Re:  [tree-ssa] error: Invalid operand to 
 binary operator

In message <20040323025330.29184.qmail@sources.redhat.com>, "pinskia at gcc dot
 gnu dot org" writes:
 >
 >------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-03-23 0
 >2:53 -------
 >This should be critical because it shows up in PR 8361: if ((long int)__n_7 <
 > 0) goto <L1>
 >; else goto <L2>;
I know it affects 8361 -- that's how I found out about it in the first
place! :-)
jeff



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14682