* [Bug target/14262] Structure size computed wrong
2004-02-23 20:14 [Bug c/14262] New: Structure size computed wrong rbh00 at utsglobal dot com
@ 2004-02-24 4:58 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-05 22:01 ` uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (21 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-02-24 4:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|c |target
Keywords| |wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14262
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/14262] Structure size computed wrong
2004-02-23 20:14 [Bug c/14262] New: Structure size computed wrong rbh00 at utsglobal dot com
2004-02-24 4:58 ` [Bug target/14262] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-03-05 22:01 ` uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-11 22:54 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (20 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-03-05 22:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-03-05 22:01:47
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14262
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/14262] Structure size computed wrong
2004-02-23 20:14 [Bug c/14262] New: Structure size computed wrong rbh00 at utsglobal dot com
2004-02-24 4:58 ` [Bug target/14262] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-05 22:01 ` uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-03-11 22:54 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-12 0:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (19 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-03-11 22:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-11 22:54 -------
Subject: Bug 14262
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Changes by: uweigand@gcc.gnu.org 2004-03-11 22:53:53
Modified files:
gcc : ChangeLog calls.c
gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog
Added files:
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg: 20040305-2.c
Log message:
PR target/14262
* calls.c (load_register_parameters): If BLOCK_REG_PADDING is not
defined, pass small BLKmode values in registers in the low-order part.
* gcc.dg/20040305-2.c: New test.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.3139&r2=2.3140
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/calls.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.323&r2=1.324
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.3597&r2=1.3598
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/20040305-2.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14262
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/14262] Structure size computed wrong
2004-02-23 20:14 [Bug c/14262] New: Structure size computed wrong rbh00 at utsglobal dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-03-11 22:54 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-03-12 0:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-20 6:08 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (18 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-03-12 0:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-12 00:46 -------
Fixed for 3.5.0.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |3.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14262
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/14262] Structure size computed wrong
2004-02-23 20:14 [Bug c/14262] New: Structure size computed wrong rbh00 at utsglobal dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2004-03-12 0:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-03-20 6:08 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-20 6:57 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (17 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-03-20 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-20 06:08 -------
This fix to calls.c changes the ABI of darwin. The testcase which fails is in
libffi. cls_3_1byte.c fails now.
Before the patch the alignment looked like this:
0xbffffb08: 0x0c0d0ebe 0xb2b3b4c0
(12, 13, 14 and 178, 179, 180)
The 3 char's where aligned to the left.
Now with the patch it looks like this:
0xbffffb08: 0x000c0d0e 0x00b2b3b4
They are right aligned now.
Though I don't know what is the right way (tm).
I will verify the current behavior of the Apple's system compiler based on
gcc-3.3.
Either the ABI of darwin is wrong or this change has to be modified that the old
behavior of the darwin ABI is restored.
Further comments comming.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14262
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/14262] Structure size computed wrong
2004-02-23 20:14 [Bug c/14262] New: Structure size computed wrong rbh00 at utsglobal dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2004-03-20 6:08 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-03-20 6:57 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-23 19:44 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (16 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-03-20 6:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-20 06:57 -------
Ok, here the outstanding test from Apple's system compiler:
[wallstreet:~/test/libffi] andreast% ./cls_3_1byte.exe
12 13 14 178 179 180: 190 192 194
res: 190 192 194
12 13 14 178 179 180: 190 192 194
res: 190 192 194
[wallstreet:~/test/libffi] andreast% gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/libexec/gcc/darwin/ppc/3.3/specs
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.3 20030304 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 1493)
So, it seems the apple compiler does it the same way as it was before the patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14262
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/14262] Structure size computed wrong
2004-02-23 20:14 [Bug c/14262] New: Structure size computed wrong rbh00 at utsglobal dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2004-03-20 6:57 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-03-23 19:44 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-09 18:55 ` geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (15 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-03-23 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-23 19:43 -------
This patchlet brings darwin back to the old behavior.
Though, it is on other people to decide what's correct.
Thank you.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14262
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/14262] Structure size computed wrong
2004-02-23 20:14 [Bug c/14262] New: Structure size computed wrong rbh00 at utsglobal dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2004-03-23 19:44 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-04-09 18:55 ` geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-09 19:33 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-04-09 18:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-04-09 18:55 -------
The documentation of the Darwin ABI is in <file:///Developer/Documentation/DeveloperTools/
Conceptual/MachORuntime/2rt_powerpc_abi/index.html> on your system if you've installed the
documentation. (It's probably available under www.apple.com somewhere, too, but I don't know
where.)
It says that:
- Values on the stack are aligned the same way as values aligned in registers.
- Structures and arrays get padded to the *left*, that is a 3-byte structure should be preceded by a byte
of padding
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14262
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/14262] Structure size computed wrong
2004-02-23 20:14 [Bug c/14262] New: Structure size computed wrong rbh00 at utsglobal dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2004-04-09 18:55 ` geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-04-09 19:33 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-23 18:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-04-09 19:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-04-09 19:33 -------
Ok, in the 10.2 docs this part was not in. In 10.3 it is.
Fine.
Now I should fix the libffi then.
A little bit confused, then the apple gcc is also wrong isn't it?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14262
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/14262] Structure size computed wrong
2004-02-23 20:14 [Bug c/14262] New: Structure size computed wrong rbh00 at utsglobal dot com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2004-04-09 19:33 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-05-23 18:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-24 2:30 ` geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-05-23 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-05-22 20:55 -------
So is Apple's gcc right or not? I would like to know soon because there is a regression because of these
change and I would like to fix all of the regressions before even getting to phase 2 because the number
of bugs are going up and this looks like it is not changing any time soon, so fix the known regressions
now will help when we get to phase 3.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |andreast at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org, geoffk at gcc dot gnu
| |dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14262
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/14262] Structure size computed wrong
2004-02-23 20:14 [Bug c/14262] New: Structure size computed wrong rbh00 at utsglobal dot com
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2004-05-23 18:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-05-24 2:30 ` geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-25 14:44 ` dalej at apple dot com
` (11 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-05-24 2:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-05-23 22:55 -------
If Apple's GCC differs from the documentation, then one or the other is wrong, and I'm betting it's the
compiler not the documentation. I'm filing Radar 3665235 to track the problem.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14262
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/14262] Structure size computed wrong
2004-02-23 20:14 [Bug c/14262] New: Structure size computed wrong rbh00 at utsglobal dot com
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2004-05-24 2:30 ` geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-05-25 14:44 ` dalej at apple dot com
2004-05-26 14:15 ` dalej at apple dot com
` (10 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: dalej at apple dot com @ 2004-05-25 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From dalej at apple dot com 2004-05-24 17:46 -------
The code consistently left-justifies, and the documentation disagrees, in all shipping Apple
compilers (2.95, 3.1 and 3.3). So changing the code would break binary compatibility,
and IMO we can't do that; we'll need to treat this as a documentation bug, whether it
started that way or not (the discrepancy appears to precede anybody currently working on
the compiler, so nobody knows). This is not my call alone and I will try to put a definitive
answer here soon.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14262
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/14262] Structure size computed wrong
2004-02-23 20:14 [Bug c/14262] New: Structure size computed wrong rbh00 at utsglobal dot com
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2004-05-25 14:44 ` dalej at apple dot com
@ 2004-05-26 14:15 ` dalej at apple dot com
2004-06-23 22:08 ` fjahanian at apple dot com
` (9 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: dalej at apple dot com @ 2004-05-26 14:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From dalej at apple dot com 2004-05-25 23:31 -------
We have a consensus here that the Apple ABI documentation is wrong, and the existing compilers
(which all agree with each other) are correct. The actual behavior is weirder than anybody here
realized: structs TWO bytes and shorter are right-justified, structs 3 bytes and longer are left-justified.
Geoff has incompletely quoted the docs, which say structs FOUR bytes and shorter are right-justified.
Thus, the documentation is wrong only for the size 3 case exactly. We'll get that fixed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14262
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/14262] Structure size computed wrong
2004-02-23 20:14 [Bug c/14262] New: Structure size computed wrong rbh00 at utsglobal dot com
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2004-05-26 14:15 ` dalej at apple dot com
@ 2004-06-23 22:08 ` fjahanian at apple dot com
2004-06-24 6:30 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: fjahanian at apple dot com @ 2004-06-23 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From fjahanian at apple dot com 2004-06-23 20:46 -------
Our (Apple's consensus) is that we will not break ABI compatibility between our gcc3.3 and
our gcc3.5. We will change Apple's ABI documentation to reflect gcc3.3 (and our gcc3.5's)
behaviour. This patch, however, has done two things for apple-ppc-darwin platform.
1 ). It has broken Apple's ABI compatibility when structs are 3 bytes.
2) It has broken following test case, regardless, in the FSF mainline for apple-ppc-darwin.
Specifically, change to routine load_register_parameters in calls.c has done it.
extern void abort (void);
void bar (int n, int c)
{
if (c != (char) (0 ^ (n << 3)))
abort ();
}
typedef struct { char x[3]; } A3;
void foo (int size, ...)
{
A3 a3;
__builtin_va_list ap;
__builtin_va_start(ap,size);
a3 = __builtin_va_arg(ap,typeof (a3));
printf("a3.x[0] = %d\n", a3.x[0]);
bar (3, a3.x[0]);
__builtin_va_end(ap);
}
int main (void)
{
A3 a3;
a3.x[0] = 0 ^ (3 << 3);
printf("a3.x[0] = %d\n", a3.x[0]);
foo (21 , a3);
return 0;
}
[jahan5:sandbox/radars/3702185] fjahania% mygccm5o pr14262.broken.c
[jahan5:sandbox/radars/3702185] fjahania% ./a.out
a3.x[0] = 24
a3.x[0] = 0
Abort
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fjahanian at apple dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14262
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/14262] Structure size computed wrong
2004-02-23 20:14 [Bug c/14262] New: Structure size computed wrong rbh00 at utsglobal dot com
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2004-06-23 22:08 ` fjahanian at apple dot com
@ 2004-06-24 6:30 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-24 15:58 ` fjahanian at apple dot com
` (7 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-06-24 6:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-24 06:17 -------
with the suggested fix from Ulrich in comment #5:
[wolfram:~/home-work] andreast% /Volumes/src/gcc/gcc-cvs/objdir/gcc/xgcc -o
pr14262 -B/Volumes/src/gcc/gcc-cvs/objdir/gcc pr14262.c
[wolfram:~/home-work] andreast% ./pr14262
a3.x[0] = 24
a3.x[0] = 24
[wolfram:~/home-work] andreast%
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14262
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/14262] Structure size computed wrong
2004-02-23 20:14 [Bug c/14262] New: Structure size computed wrong rbh00 at utsglobal dot com
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2004-06-24 6:30 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-06-24 15:58 ` fjahanian at apple dot com
2004-06-26 18:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: fjahanian at apple dot com @ 2004-06-24 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From fjahanian at apple dot com 2004-06-24 15:56 -------
With patch in comment #5 both the test and the ABI issue is fixed in apple-ppc-darwin.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14262
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/14262] Structure size computed wrong
2004-02-23 20:14 [Bug c/14262] New: Structure size computed wrong rbh00 at utsglobal dot com
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2004-06-24 15:58 ` fjahanian at apple dot com
@ 2004-06-26 18:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-28 15:13 ` uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-06-26 18:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-26 18:29 -------
Subject: Bug 14262
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Branch: apple-ppc-branch
Changes by: fjahanian@gcc.gnu.org 2004-06-26 18:29:44
Modified files:
gcc : calls.c
Log message:
Fixes regression caused by PR 14262 in FSF mainline.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/calls.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=apple-ppc-branch&r1=1.229.2.47.2.5&r2=1.229.2.47.2.6
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14262
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/14262] Structure size computed wrong
2004-02-23 20:14 [Bug c/14262] New: Structure size computed wrong rbh00 at utsglobal dot com
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2004-06-26 18:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-06-28 15:13 ` uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-02 19:58 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-06-28 15:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-28 14:50 -------
So does that mean that you feel my patch is the correct solution?
When I proposed the patch, Jim Wilson suggested it might be better to
fix the problem by using PARALLELs in the rs6000 backend, see
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-03/msg02338.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14262
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/14262] Structure size computed wrong
2004-02-23 20:14 [Bug c/14262] New: Structure size computed wrong rbh00 at utsglobal dot com
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2004-06-28 15:13 ` uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-02 19:58 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-05 16:01 ` uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: dje at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-02 19:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-02 19:58 -------
The history is that GCC implemented the AIX ABI incorrectly. Apple's ABI is
based on the AIX ABI. The ABI technically is correct, but the Apple system
compiler never conformed to the ABI. Because Apple cannot break binary
compatibility, it needs to use the old default behavior of GCC as its revised
ABI. The behavior on AIX and PPC64 Linux have been corrected to conform to
their respective ABIs.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14262
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/14262] Structure size computed wrong
2004-02-23 20:14 [Bug c/14262] New: Structure size computed wrong rbh00 at utsglobal dot com
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-02 19:58 ` dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-05 16:01 ` uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-05 16:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-05 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-05 16:01 -------
So if I understand you correctly the patch was deliberately applied
only to the Apple branch, and is not actually required on mainline?
What I want to know is whether I should continue to work on this
issue (under the obligation to fix a bug a patch of mine introduced),
or whether any follow-on, if any is in fact required, is a matter of
ppc ABI issues and will be driven by the ppc folks ...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14262
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/14262] Structure size computed wrong
2004-02-23 20:14 [Bug c/14262] New: Structure size computed wrong rbh00 at utsglobal dot com
` (19 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-05 16:01 ` uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-05 16:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-23 18:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-25 2:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-05 16:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-05 16:14 -------
Yes it is still required on the mainline, see PR 15923 for an example of something which is broken still.
Please go and fix the regression any way, either by submitting the patch which is in this PR or any other
way.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14262
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/14262] Structure size computed wrong
2004-02-23 20:14 [Bug c/14262] New: Structure size computed wrong rbh00 at utsglobal dot com
` (20 preceding siblings ...)
2004-07-05 16:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-09-23 18:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-25 2:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-09-23 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14262
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/14262] Structure size computed wrong
2004-02-23 20:14 [Bug c/14262] New: Structure size computed wrong rbh00 at utsglobal dot com
` (21 preceding siblings ...)
2004-09-23 18:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-10-25 2:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-10-25 2:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-25 02:35 -------
The darwin problem has now been fixed by:
2004-10-24 Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>
* config/rs6000/darwin.h (BLOCK_REG_PADDING): Define.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14262
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread