public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "steven at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug pch/14137] [pch] ICE in cgraph_finalize_compilation_unit, at cgraphunit.c:407
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 22:50:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040323225039.23004.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040213062200.14137.mattyt-bugzilla@tpg.com.au>


------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-03-23 22:50 -------
I completely agree, see what I said in my mail to gcc-patches.  But to stuff 
all flags and debug settings (and machine-specific flags??) into one big struct 
and writing that out to the pch looks a bit unsafe for 3.4 ;-)

I was actually hoping that Neil's work on option handling would have included 
moving all flags to some struct, but unfortunately...

I'll commit the patch and keep the bug open, targeted for 3.5.



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14137


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-03-23 22:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-13  6:22 [Bug c++/14137] New: " mattyt-bugzilla at tpg dot com dot au
2004-02-13  6:36 ` [Bug pch/14137] [pch] [unit-at-a-time] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-02-13  6:42 ` [Bug pch/14137] [pch] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-02-13 18:55 ` geoffk at desire dot geoffk dot org
2004-03-22 17:54 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-22 18:34 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-23 21:52 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-23 22:50 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2004-03-24 22:28 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-24 22:30 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-26 23:38 ` geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-26 23:53 ` stevenb at suse dot de
2004-03-27  6:16 ` geoffk at desire dot geoffk dot org
2004-03-27 10:11 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-30 17:23 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
2004-03-30 23:07 ` geoffk at desire dot geoffk dot org
2004-03-30 23:26 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-04-08 19:55 ` geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-08 20:16 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
2004-04-08 23:41 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-08 23:45 ` geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040323225039.23004.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).