public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug preprocessor/14438] [3.5, needs investigation] -E of #pragma has negative line number
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 04:36:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040324043559.26435.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040305002353.14438.lindsayd@cisco.com>
------- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-24 04:35 -------
>I suppose one way to fix this issue would be to decrement cur_token
>again when returning in the CPP_EOF case, such that we'd return the
>same EOF token over and over;
Actually, that sounds like a fairly robust thing to do -- in _cpp_lex_direct,
perhaps?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14438
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-24 4:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-05 0:23 [Bug preprocessor/14438] New: -E of #pragma poison " lindsayd at cisco dot com
2004-03-05 8:20 ` [Bug preprocessor/14438] [3.4/3.5 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-10 16:22 ` [Bug preprocessor/14438] [3.3/3.4/3.5 Regression] -E of #pragma " reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-11 6:55 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-20 21:17 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-21 20:16 ` zack at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-21 20:18 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-21 22:11 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-03-23 0:45 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-23 0:55 ` lindsayd at cisco dot com
2004-03-23 1:13 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-24 3:18 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-24 3:19 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-24 3:19 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-24 3:27 ` [Bug preprocessor/14438] [3.5, needs investigation] " aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-24 4:31 ` aoliva at redhat dot com
2004-03-24 4:36 ` neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2004-03-24 4:59 ` zack at codesourcery dot com
2004-03-30 21:59 ` aoliva at redhat dot com
2004-03-31 0:07 ` [Bug preprocessor/14438] Potential need for buffer overflow checks in _cpp_lex_direct zack at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-31 0:08 ` zack at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-31 0:09 ` zack at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-21 5:06 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-05 2:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-07-08 1:44 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-10 5:58 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040324043559.26435.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).