From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11249 invoked by alias); 24 Mar 2004 15:57:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11230 invoked by uid 48); 24 Mar 2004 15:57:45 -0000 Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 15:57:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040324155745.11228.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040312233606.14563.paulthomas2@wanadoo.fr> References: <20040312233606.14563.paulthomas2@wanadoo.fr> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/14563] octave built under Cygwin very slow X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg02907.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-03-24 15:57 ------- First, thanks for you efforts! The Unwind_SjLj_* functions have to do with exceptions. Danny, I CC: you because here's a cygwin question: is sjlj the default on windows, and are you aware of any significant changes in this area that could affect this? Paul&Ben: even if the problem is in this function, am I correct with my math that these functions only account for at most about 1/4 of the run-time? If that is the case, then they can't make up for a six-fold increase in run-time... W. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dannysmith at sources dot | |redhat dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14563