From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3671 invoked by alias); 28 Mar 2004 18:45:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3573 invoked by uid 48); 28 Mar 2004 18:45:24 -0000 Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 18:45:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040328184524.3572.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040120183908.13776.kgardas@objectsecurity.com> References: <20040120183908.13776.kgardas@objectsecurity.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/13776] [tree-ssa] Many C++ compile-time regression in 3.5-tree-ssa 040120 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg03246.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-28 18:45 ------- I noticed that bsi functions were not being optimized that well because bsi is a struct which contained structs so marking this depends on PR 13953 which is for SRA optimizing on structs containing structs. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |13953 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13776