public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/14563] octave built under Cygwin very slow
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 21:19:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040328211906.32727.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040312233606.14563.paulthomas2@wanadoo.fr>


------- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr  2004-03-28 21:18 -------
Subject: Re: [Fwd:  octave built under Cygwin very slow]

Well, we seem to have got rid of the smoked fish (sorry, red herring) 
and now have a smoking howitzer......

Paul,

It strikes me that not only is new/delete slow for cygwin331 but that 
malloc/delete must also take most of the execution time for the octave 
tests.  These seem to be totally excluded from the profiling.

I have added the Intel, Visual C and gcc331 times for Windows XP on an 
Athlon 1700

Paul T

PS I would have added the exit but I was going to bash ctrl-c is 
anything went wrong with the allocation.

Paul Kienzle wrote:

> Tests of malloc and new [] for cygwin and mingw 3.2 and 3.3 and linux 
> gcc 3.3.
> Someone please fill in numbers for 'native' windows compilers, such as
> visual C and Intel.
>
> === Times, running under msys on a Windows 2000 PII-300 system
>
> System        real        user        sys
> mingw333    17.936    0.030    0.040
> cygwin331    72.394    0.020    0.060
> Cmingw333    12.277    0.010    0.060
> Ccygwin331    24.355    0.030    0.050
>
> System        real        user        sys
> mingw323    18.837    0.020    0.040
> mingw32        14.160    0.010    0.060
> cygwin32        15.933    0.020    0.050
> Cmingw32    12.668    0.030    0.040
> Ccygwin32    14.410    0.010    0.080

Paul Thomas adds...

   === Elapsed times running under Windows XP on an Athlon 1700

  System              execution time (octave> 
tic;system('./malloctest.exe');toc
  intel                   2.19
  VC                    2.17
  cygwin331        19.86
  Cintel                2.58
  CVC                 2.37
  Ccygwin331     4.34   
 

>
> === Times, running under bash on a Debian PII-400 system
>
> System        real        user        sys
> linux332         4.808    4.800    0.010
> Clinux332     3.162    3.160    0.000
>
> === Versions
>
> mingw32        3.2 (mingw special 20020817-1)
> mingw323    3.2.3 (mingw special 20030504-1)
> mingw333    3.3.3 (mingw special)
> cygwin32        3.2 (20020927 prerelease), linked against stdc++.dll
> cygwin331    3.3.1-3 (cygming special)
> linux332        3.3.2 20030908 (Debian prerelease)
>
> === C++ Compiled with g++ -O2.  Run under msys.
> // Author Paul Thomas
> #include <iostream>
> using namespace std;
>
> int main()
> {
>   for (int iloop = 0; iloop < 10000000; iloop++)
>   {
>     double *myarray;
>     if ((myarray = new double [1]) == NULL)
>         cout << "unable to allocate my array at iloop=" << iloop << endl;
>     delete [] myarray;
>   }
>   cout << "done looping" << endl;
>   return 0;
> }
>
> === C Compiled with gcc -O2.  Run under msys.
> /* modified from C++ by Paul Kienzle */
> #include <stdio.h>
> int main()
> {
>   int iloop;
>   for (iloop = 0; iloop < 10000000; iloop++)
>   {
>     double *myarray = (double *)malloc(sizeof(double));
>     if (myarray== NULL) { printf("alloc failed\n"); exit(1); }
>     else free (myarray);
>   }
>   return 0;
> }
>
>




-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14563


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-03-28 21:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-03-12 23:36 [Bug c++/14563] New: " paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr
2004-03-13  7:24 ` [Bug c++/14563] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-13  8:06 ` paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr
2004-03-14 20:33 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-03-24  9:52 ` paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr
2004-03-24 15:57 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-03-24 16:38 ` paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr
2004-03-24 17:03 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-03-24 21:07 ` Ben dot Diedrich at noaa dot gov
2004-03-24 22:58 ` dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net
2004-03-25  6:40 ` paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr
2004-03-25 13:43 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-03-25 14:16 ` Ben dot Diedrich at noaa dot gov
2004-03-25 14:17 ` paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr
2004-03-25 14:26 ` paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr
2004-03-25 14:37 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-03-25 15:37 ` Ben dot Diedrich at noaa dot gov
2004-03-25 16:41 ` paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr
2004-03-28 21:19 ` paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr [this message]
2004-03-28 22:28 ` pkienzle at users dot sf dot net
2004-03-31  0:21 ` paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr
2004-04-02 17:43 ` paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr
2004-04-02 19:55 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-04-02 20:35 ` dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net
2004-04-02 20:41 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2004-04-02 20:44 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-04-03  9:10 ` paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr
2004-04-03 17:19 ` epanelelytha at kellertimo dot de
2004-04-03 17:54 ` paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr
2004-04-03 18:00 ` epanelelytha at kellertimo dot de
2004-04-03 18:24 ` paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr
2004-07-12 14:50 ` [Bug libstdc++/14563] new/delete much slower than malloc/free pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-12 19:21 ` paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr
2004-07-12 20:55 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-07-13  4:17 ` paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr
2004-07-28  2:50 ` ron_hylton at hotmail dot com
2004-07-28  3:57 ` ron_hylton at hotmail dot com
2004-07-28  6:03 ` [Bug target/14563] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-29  4:23 ` ron_hylton at hotmail dot com
2004-08-08  9:24 ` paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr
2004-11-10  8:21 ` [Bug target/14563] [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] new/delete much slower than malloc/free because of sjlj exceptions giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-11-10  8:21 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-11-10  9:10 ` dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net
2004-11-10 12:46 ` [Bug target/14563] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-11-10 16:20 ` ron_hylton at hotmail dot com
2004-11-10 17:05 ` kjd at duda dot org
2004-11-13 11:03 ` paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr
2004-11-14 17:03 ` ken dot duda at gmail dot com
2004-11-14 18:04 ` paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr
2004-11-14 22:40 ` ken dot duda at gmail dot com
2005-05-12 14:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-12 14:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040328211906.32727.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).