From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12688 invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2004 16:33:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12669 invoked by uid 48); 29 Mar 2004 16:33:18 -0000 Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:33:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040329163318.12668.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040318204708.14640.debian-gcc@lists.debian.org> References: <20040318204708.14640.debian-gcc@lists.debian.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug optimization/14640] [3.3/3.4/3.5 regression] miscompilation of mozilla-firefox (deallocator problems?) X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg03309.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-03-29 16:33 ------- Gaby: are you aware of this regression on the 3.3 branch due to a backported patch? We could avoid this is we undo the regression by reverting the backport and simply stick with the breakage of PR 10776. Debian maintainers: I think this PR is enough in itself, we don't gain by opening more bug reports about the same problem. However, you could aid us some more by identifying which part of the file you named is miscompiled. For this you'd split up the file into multiple files that each have only one function, and do the same procedure you had for identifying which of the original files was the problem on the new one-function-only files. Thanks Wolfgang -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14640