From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1326 invoked by alias); 31 Mar 2004 05:40:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1129 invoked by uid 48); 31 Mar 2004 05:40:24 -0000 Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 05:40:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040331054024.1127.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040331025513.14792.kazu@cs.umass.edu> References: <20040331025513.14792.kazu@cs.umass.edu> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug optimization/14792] [tree-ssa] cast elimination opportunity involving an AND X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg03489.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-31 05:40 ------- On PPC here is why this code is not optimial: _foo: lbz r4,0(r3) extsb r0,r4 <--- extra extends byte rlwinm r2,r0,0,31,31 <-- as this is just an and 1 (trust me) cmpwi cr7,r2,0 beqlr- cr7 bnelr- cr7 b _link_error -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14792