From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14356 invoked by alias); 1 Apr 2004 18:42:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14318 invoked by alias); 1 Apr 2004 18:42:37 -0000 Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 18:42:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040401184237.14316.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "dnovillo at redhat dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040322193838.14682.aj@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20040322193838.14682.aj@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug optimization/14682] [tree-ssa] error: Invalid operand to binary operator X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00079.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From dnovillo at redhat dot com 2004-04-01 18:42 ------- Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] error: Invalid operand to binary operator On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 13:40, law at redhat dot com wrote: > >> + /* Note that the folders should only create gimple expressions. > >> + This is a hack until the new folder is ready. */ > >> + in_gimple_form = 1; > >> + > >> /* Perform all tree transforms and optimizations. */ > >> execute_pass_list (all_passes); > >> + > >> + /* Note that the folders can create non-gimple expressions again. */ > >> + in_gimple_form = 1; > > > >Typo second time. > Thanks. Brain fart. I also changed them to use true/false respectively. > Oh, heh. We were all looking at the same thing then. I committed the obvious fix a few minutes ago. Diego. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14682