From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-91112-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 26780 invoked by alias); 2 Apr 2004 20:41:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26768 invoked by uid 48); 2 Apr 2004 20:41:10 -0000
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 20:41:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20040402204110.26767.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
From: "pcarlini at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20040312233606.14563.paulthomas2@wanadoo.fr>
References: <20040312233606.14563.paulthomas2@wanadoo.fr>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/14563] octave built under Cygwin very slow
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00209.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de  2004-04-02 20:41 -------
Just curious: what happens for the scalar version

  myarray = new double;
  ..
  ..
  delete myarray;

(which seems more appropriate for a single double)??
Also, please remove that 'if(myarray = new double [1]) == NULL)',
I really can't bear it ;)


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14563