From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27027 invoked by alias); 6 Apr 2004 16:16:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26956 invoked by uid 48); 6 Apr 2004 16:16:33 -0000 Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 16:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040406161633.26955.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20031218033126.13424.danglin@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20031218033126.13424.danglin@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug optimization/13424] [3.4/3.5 Regression] gcc.dg/20031202-1.c is miscompiled X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00537.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-04-06 16:16 ------- John, I am unaware of all the detours this has taken, but - the synopsis of the bug says this is a 3.4/3.5 regression - the patch seems to have only been applied to 3.4 Can you say, in one word, whether closing the PR is intentional, and/or whether it should be kept open for 3.5? Thanks for answering a maybe naive question, W. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13424