From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13738 invoked by alias); 6 Apr 2004 20:44:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13428 invoked by uid 48); 6 Apr 2004 20:43:41 -0000 Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 20:44:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040406204341.13427.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20031218033126.13424.danglin@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20031218033126.13424.danglin@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug optimization/13424] [3.4/3.5 Regression] gcc.dg/20031202-1.c is miscompiled X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00563.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-04-06 20:43 ------- Right, I'm sorry I missed comment #35 :-( As to the exact format, I don't know, but here is one that apparently made it into both PR audit trails: 2004-03-06 Eric Botcazou PR c/14465 PR c/14114 * c-decl (pushdecl): Revert previous change. So that seems to be a form that works. W. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13424