public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "joel at oarcorp dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/14537] sparc-rtems predefines unix
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 12:56:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040407125612.6206.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040311194251.14537.joel@gcc.gnu.org>


------- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com  2004-04-07 12:56 -------
Subject: Re:  sparc-rtems predefines unix

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-04-07 02:57 -------
> This patch was okayed for 3.4.0 but never applied, Mark I know you do not want any 
> patch which can cause many problems at this point as we are about to release but is this 
> still okay to apply for 3.4.0? Joel if Mark says it is okay, then please apply right away as 
> the release is near.
> 
I have not committed this because I do not have a working
3.4.x sparc-rtems toolset.  I got side-tracked with
the cross gnatmake and generic *-rtems run-time issues.
So this patch is off the table for 3.4.0.




-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14537


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-04-07 12:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-03-11 19:42 [Bug target/14537] New: " joel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-11 19:43 ` [Bug target/14537] " joel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-11 19:47 ` joel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-11 20:24 ` joel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-11 21:36 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-13 16:06 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-22  2:23 ` joel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-07  2:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-07 12:56 ` joel at oarcorp dot com [this message]
2004-05-29 23:12 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
     [not found] <bug-14537-296@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-22  8:34 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040407125612.6206.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).