From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24697 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2004 13:37:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24665 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2004 13:37:39 -0000 Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 13:37:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040407133739.24664.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040406114325.14863.rguenth@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> References: <20040406114325.14863.rguenth@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug optimization/14863] [3.4/3.5 regression] unit-at-a-time causes miscompilation X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00640.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2004-04-07 13:37 ------- Subject: Re: [3.4/3.5 regression] unit-at-a-time causes miscompilation On Wed, 7 Apr 2004, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > The other thing is that you could be over running the buffer which could > cause this problem. Enabling bounds-checking code doesn't show any errors. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14863