From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30182 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2004 18:53:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30138 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2004 18:53:16 -0000 Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 18:53:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040407185316.30137.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "ian at wasabisystems dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040303083528.14400.schmid@snake.iap.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> References: <20040303083528.14400.schmid@snake.iap.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug pch/14400] [3.4/3.5 regression] Cannot compile qt-x11-free-3.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00663.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From ian at wasabisystems dot com 2004-04-07 18:53 ------- Subject: Re: [3.4/3.5 regression] Cannot compile qt-x11-free-3.3.0 "mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org" writes: > Can QT be compiled if PCH is explicitly not used? > > In other words, could the QT Makefiles work around this problem by not using a > PCH file? I have confirmed that, if I comment out the line in the QT configure script where QT tests for PCH support, the build gets past the previous point of failure, using the 3.4 branch compiler on i686-pc-linux-gnu. QT takes forever to build on my system; I will report back in this PR if there is any failure later in the build. Pending that, the answer to your question is "yes." For the record, the change I made to the configure script was to comment out this line: $unixtests/precomp.test $XQMAKESPEC $OPT_VERBOSE || QMAKE_CONFIG="$QMAKE_CONFIG precompile_header" precomp.test is a fairly simple test which checks to see whether the compiler accepts "-x c-header" and "-x c++-header". I don't see any obvious way to use a command line argument to affect the test result. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14400