public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "mark at codesourcery dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug pch/14400] [3.4/3.5 regression] Cannot compile qt-x11-free-3.3.0
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 19:21:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040407192121.25254.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040303083528.14400.schmid@snake.iap.physik.tu-darmstadt.de>


------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com  2004-04-07 19:21 -------
Subject: Re:  [3.4/3.5 regression] Cannot compile qt-x11-free-3.3.0

Ian Lance Taylor wrote:

>"mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
>
>  
>
>>Can QT be compiled if PCH is explicitly not used?
>>
>>In other words, could the QT Makefiles work around this problem by not using a
>>PCH file?
>>    
>>
>
>I have confirmed that, if I comment out the line in the QT configure
>script where QT tests for PCH support, the build gets past the
>previous point of failure, using the 3.4 branch compiler on
>i686-pc-linux-gnu.  QT takes forever to build on my system; I will
>report back in this PR if there is any failure later in the build.
>Pending that, the answer to your question is "yes."
>  
>
Thanks for the research.

Given that, I'll adopt the documentation approach to this problem.  PCH 
seems to be useful for lots of people, but we ought to warn people that 
there are problems.

Thanks,



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14400


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-04-07 19:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-03-03  8:35 [Bug pch/14400] New: " schmid at snake dot iap dot physik dot tu-darmstadt dot de
2004-03-03 12:40 ` [Bug pch/14400] " giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-03-03 16:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-04  6:07 ` schmid at snake dot iap dot physik dot tu-darmstadt dot de
2004-03-04  7:03 ` schmid at snake dot iap dot physik dot tu-darmstadt dot de
2004-03-17  5:50 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-17  5:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-25  6:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-26  8:01 ` schmid at snake dot iap dot physik dot tu-darmstadt dot de
2004-03-27  7:03 ` ian at wasabisystems dot com
2004-03-30  1:42 ` geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-30  7:07 ` ian at wasabisystems dot com
2004-04-01  1:17 ` geoffk at apple dot com
2004-04-02 15:18 ` ian at wasabisystems dot com
2004-04-02 19:16 ` geoffk at apple dot com
2004-04-04  3:39 ` ian at wasabisystems dot com
2004-04-05 20:40 ` [Bug pch/14400] [3.4 regression] " ian at wasabisystems dot com
2004-04-05 20:54 ` mrs at apple dot com
2004-04-05 22:50 ` geoffk at apple dot com
2004-04-06  0:39 ` ian at wasabisystems dot com
2004-04-06 13:34 ` [Bug pch/14400] [3.4/3.5 " ian at wasabisystems dot com
2004-04-07 18:01 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-07 18:34 ` mueller at kde dot org
2004-04-07 18:53 ` ian at wasabisystems dot com
2004-04-07 19:21 ` mark at codesourcery dot com [this message]
2004-04-07 19:22 ` [Bug pch/14400] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-07 19:35 ` ian at wasabisystems dot com
2004-04-07 20:44 ` ian at wasabisystems dot com
2004-04-12 21:11 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-12 22:07 ` geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-12 22:45 ` ian at wasabisystems dot com
2004-04-12 23:13 ` geoffk at apple dot com
2004-04-13 15:07 ` ian at wasabisystems dot com
2004-04-13 18:38 ` geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-13 19:48 ` ian at wasabisystems dot com
2004-04-13 19:53 ` geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-29 22:54 ` [Bug pch/14400] [pch] " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-06-18 23:57 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-23 20:55 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-11-01  0:47 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-14  0:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-19 17:50 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-02 19:04 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-08-02 19:05 ` ian at airs dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040407192121.25254.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).