From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26499 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2004 09:09:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26449 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2004 09:09:37 -0000 Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 09:09:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040408090937.26448.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040407223218.14884.jsm28@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20040407223218.14884.jsm28@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug other/14884] [3.3/3.4 only] rpc/xdr.h should be fixincluded X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00709.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk 2004-04-08 09:09 ------- Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4 only] rpc/xdr.h should be fixincluded On Wed, 7 Apr 2004, gdr at integrable-solutions dot net wrote: > | The patch > | is now on mainline but should go in 3.4.0 and 3.3.4, the releases > | which introduce the deprecation of lvalue casts. (glibc CVS has > | also been fixed, using exactly the same definitions as the fixincludes > | fixes use.) > | > | OK for 3.4 branch? > > OK for 3.3.4. I don't now have a 3.3 branch checkout, could you apply the patch (and regenerate fixincl.x) there? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14884