From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24300 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2004 20:37:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24274 invoked by uid 48); 8 Apr 2004 20:37:14 -0000 Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 20:37:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040408203714.24272.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20031204043712.13294.bkoz@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20031204043712.13294.bkoz@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/13294] [3.4 Regression] namespace associations vs. specializations X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00768.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-04-08 20:37 ------- Ok, whatever. I should have collected my thoughts on this.... I'll note that with your patch the behavior is already correct, but the mangling is still subject to improvement. What you are suggesting is getting both of these items, right? -benjamin -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13294