From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25826 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2004 20:42:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25809 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2004 20:42:19 -0000 Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 20:42:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040408204219.25807.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "jason at redhat dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040309045153.14500.bkoz@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20040309045153.14500.bkoz@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/14500] most specialized function template vs. non-template function X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00769.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From jason at redhat dot com 2004-04-08 20:42 ------- Subject: Re: most specialized function template vs. non-template function On 8 Apr 2004 19:59:47 -0000, "bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org" wrote: > The other implementation of namespace association, EDG, had a similar > error to g++ pre patch. Should we ask Daveed for his opinion on this? I'm sure EDG was just trying to be compatible with us. Jason -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14500