From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27040 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2004 20:43:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27015 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2004 20:43:16 -0000 Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 20:43:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040408204316.27014.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "jason at redhat dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20031204043712.13294.bkoz@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20031204043712.13294.bkoz@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/13294] [3.4 Regression] namespace associations vs. specializations X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00770.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From jason at redhat dot com 2004-04-08 20:43 ------- Subject: Re: [3.4 Regression] namespace associations vs. specializations On 8 Apr 2004 20:37:14 -0000, "bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org" wrote: > Ok, whatever. I should have collected my thoughts on this.... I'll note > that with your patch the behavior is already correct, but the mangling is > still subject to improvement. What you are suggesting is getting both of > these items, right? Yes. Jason -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13294