From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-91718-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 14350 invoked by alias); 9 Apr 2004 02:44:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14341 invoked by uid 48); 9 Apr 2004 02:44:37 -0000
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 02:44:00 -0000
From: "igodard at pacbell dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Message-ID: <20040409024432.14898.igodard@pacbell.net>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/14898] New: Fails to detect missing "return"
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00815.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

App segv's because called inline function has no "return" statement; compile reports no error. While I suppose this is legal, it is distinctly unfriendly.

-- 
           Summary: Fails to detect missing "return"
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.3.1
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: igodard at pacbell dot net
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14898