From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 480 invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2004 14:04:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 446 invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2004 14:04:07 -0000 Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 14:58:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040410140407.445.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040120183908.13776.kgardas@objectsecurity.com> References: <20040120183908.13776.kgardas@objectsecurity.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/13776] [tree-ssa] Many C++ compile-time regression in 3.5-tree-ssa 040120 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00878.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2004-04-10 14:04 ------- Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Many C++ compile-time regression in 3.5-tree-ssa 040120 Again the automatic tester at http://www.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de/~rguenth/gcc/monitor-summary.html caught some compile time regressions for tree-ssa. While bootstrap time didn't change (much), tramp3d-v3 compile time got a hit between Wednesday and Thursday, same for runtime. You'll also note that mainline runtime was improving a lot yesterday. There aren't that much changes on tree-ssa right now, so I suspect changes causing the regression be 2004-04-07 Diego Novillo * gimplify.c (gimplify_call_expr): Remove argument POST_P. Update all callers. Don't use POST_P when gimplifying the call expression. (the tree is updated at 3am CEST, incident happened with the update on Thursday) Richard. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13776