From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30822 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2004 15:33:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30737 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2004 15:32:57 -0000 Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 15:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040412153257.30736.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "gdr at integrable-solutions dot net" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040411221509.14919.hjl@lucon.org> References: <20040411221509.14919.hjl@lucon.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug debug/14919] [3.3]: DW_AT_comp_dir is missing X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00982.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2004-04-12 15:32 ------- Subject: Re: [3.3]: DW_AT_comp_dir is missing "hjl at lucon dot org" writes: | Gaby, this bug is not a regression against 3.2. But it was fixed in the gcc 3.2 | Red Hat branch more tha a year ago. I'd like to bring this bug fix up to gcc 3.3 | branch. Can you give me a sense of the effects of proposed patches (e.g. results of testsuites on at least two major evaluation plateforms)? This is going to be the last non-regression patches appalied to 3.3.4. I'm going to announce that shortly. Others would have to wait 3.3.5. Thanks, -- Gaby -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14919