From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6292 invoked by alias); 13 Apr 2004 18:35:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6277 invoked by uid 48); 13 Apr 2004 18:35:44 -0000 Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 18:41:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040413183544.6276.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040221172413.14238.carlo@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20040221172413.14238.carlo@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug pch/14238] Dependency tracking and PCH X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg01091.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-04-13 18:35 ------- This is correct behaviour. When the PCH is in use, a2.h is not directly used in the compilation of a.o. You could delete a2.h and the compilation would still succeed. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14238