From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30031 invoked by alias); 13 Apr 2004 19:16:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30013 invoked by uid 48); 13 Apr 2004 19:16:24 -0000 Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 19:53:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040413191624.30012.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040303083528.14400.schmid@snake.iap.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> References: <20040303083528.14400.schmid@snake.iap.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug pch/14400] Cannot compile qt-x11-free-3.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg01099.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-04-13 19:16 ------- I don't know if we have a mutual understanding. This bug is "Cannot compile qt-x11-free-3.3.0" on "i686-pc-linux-gnu" because of "pch". If backporting RTH's fix means that qt does build on i686- linux (or at least doesn't fail because of pch), then backporting RTH's fix will fix this bug, and so the release criteria test as described in this PR should pass. I don't know how to fix an idea. That seems like it's outside the scope of software engineering. I think that in the general case, this bug and similar bugs must be fixed in each specific case. So it's not helpful to try to have a bug tracking the general case. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14400