public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "giovannibajo at libero dot it" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/13294] [3.4 Regression] namespace associations vs. specializations
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 11:36:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040414101028.25348.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031204043712.13294.bkoz@gcc.gnu.org>
------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-04-14 10:10 -------
(In reply to comment #29)
> I'm wondering if we should punt on this stuff for 3.4.0, and revert to STL
> in namespace std.
You mean pulling the debug stuff from 3.4.0? Isn't that too much an invasive
change right now? We are a tad late.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13294
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-14 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-04 4:37 [Bug c++/13294] New: " bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-04 8:03 ` [Bug c++/13294] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-12-17 5:40 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-14 3:36 ` [Bug c++/13294] [3.4 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-09 10:48 ` [Bug c++/13294] [3.4/3.5 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-25 22:12 ` jason at redhat dot com
2004-03-26 6:40 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-03-26 6:41 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-03-26 17:22 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-26 19:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-26 19:35 ` [Bug c++/13294] [3.4 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-30 17:58 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-31 2:10 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-31 2:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-05 23:20 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-06 4:39 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-06 9:01 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-07 17:58 ` jason at redhat dot com
2004-04-07 19:18 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
2004-04-08 20:35 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-08 20:37 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-08 20:43 ` jason at redhat dot com
2004-04-08 22:46 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-04-08 22:48 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-04-08 22:49 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-04-08 23:04 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-09 6:37 ` jason at redhat dot com
2004-04-13 18:56 ` jason at redhat dot com
2004-04-13 23:49 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-14 7:52 ` bkoz at redhat dot com
2004-04-14 11:36 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it [this message]
2004-04-14 14:39 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-04-14 19:04 ` gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-04-14 19:45 ` jason at redhat dot com
2004-04-14 19:48 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-14 21:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-14 21:21 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-16 18:51 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
2004-04-16 19:41 ` bkoz at redhat dot com
2004-04-17 2:51 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040414101028.25348.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).