From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10036 invoked by alias); 14 Apr 2004 12:55:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10013 invoked by uid 48); 14 Apr 2004 12:55:34 -0000 Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 14:39:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040414125534.10012.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20031204043712.13294.bkoz@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20031204043712.13294.bkoz@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/13294] [3.4 Regression] namespace associations vs. specializations X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg01160.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-04-14 12:55 ------- Did I hear someone say that gcc extensions are a double-edged sword? :-) W. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13294