public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/14915] New: Testsuite failure on mips-sgi-irix6.5 in gcc.dg/builtins-32.c
@ 2004-04-11  1:06 ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-04-12 20:43 ` [Bug target/14915] " wilson at specifixinc dot com
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-04-11  1:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

I'm getting a testsuite failure on mips-sgi-irix6.5 in gcc.dg/builtins-32.c.  Th
e test passes the "float" sized checks, but fails for the "double" size.  Specif
ically, I get an abort for test(-2.0) which incorrectly returns zero.  We're 
exercising the extract_bit_field() path in expand_builtin_signbit() in 
the "double" case but not in the "float" case.

The failure runs from here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-02/msg00173.html
through to a current report:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-04/msg00359.html

Mips sets BITS_BIG_ENDIAN to zero, so it doesn't reverse the bitpos.  But if I 
force it to do so, the testcase passes.  Like so:

--- ../../orig/gcc-CVS20040409/gcc/builtins.c  Fri Apr  9 17:03:58 2004
+++ builtins.c  Sat Apr 10 11:26:17 2004
@@ -5036,7 +5036,7 @@ expand_builtin_signbit (tree exp, rtx ta

   if (GET_MODE_BITSIZE (imode) > GET_MODE_BITSIZE (rmode))
     {
-      if (BITS_BIG_ENDIAN)
+      if (BITS_BIG_ENDIAN || 1)
        bitpos = GET_MODE_BITSIZE (imode) - 1 - bitpos;
       temp = copy_to_mode_reg (imode, temp);
       temp = extract_bit_field (temp, 1, bitpos, 1,

Perhaps the logic to enter this path isn't completely correct?
E.g. do we need to test some other macro in addition to BITS_BIG_ENDIAN?

-- 
           Summary: Testsuite failure on mips-sgi-irix6.5 in
                    gcc.dg/builtins-32.c
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: wrong-code
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: target
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org,roger at eyesopen dot
                    com
 GCC build triplet: mips-sgi-irix6.5
  GCC host triplet: mips-sgi-irix6.5
GCC target triplet: mips-sgi-irix6.5


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14915


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/14915] Testsuite failure on mips-sgi-irix6.5 in gcc.dg/builtins-32.c
  2004-04-11  1:06 [Bug target/14915] New: Testsuite failure on mips-sgi-irix6.5 in gcc.dg/builtins-32.c ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-04-12 20:43 ` wilson at specifixinc dot com
  2004-04-13 12:47 ` [Bug target/14915] [3.5 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-04-15 23:46 ` [Bug middle-end/14915] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: wilson at specifixinc dot com @ 2004-04-12 20:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com  2004-04-12 20:21 -------
Subject: Re:  New: Testsuite failure on mips-sgi-irix6.5
 in gcc.dg/builtins-32.c

ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> Mips sets BITS_BIG_ENDIAN to zero, so it doesn't reverse the bitpos.  But if I 
> force it to do so, the testcase passes.  Like so:

BITS_BIG_ENDIAN only affects how we number bits within a 
{zero,sign}_extract.  MIPS has no bit field instructions, so no need to 
set BITS_BIG_ENDIAN.  We can give it an arbitrary value. 
BITS_BIG_ENDIAN should not be used for any other purpose.

It looks like the expand_builtin_signbit code should be using 
BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN instead of BITS_BIG_ENDIAN.  Endian-ness tests always 
use BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN.  Never use BITS_BIG_ENDIAN in an endianness test.

See also the docs for BITS_BIG_ENDIAN which mention this stuff.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14915


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/14915] [3.5 Regression] Testsuite failure on mips-sgi-irix6.5 in gcc.dg/builtins-32.c
  2004-04-11  1:06 [Bug target/14915] New: Testsuite failure on mips-sgi-irix6.5 in gcc.dg/builtins-32.c ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-04-12 20:43 ` [Bug target/14915] " wilson at specifixinc dot com
@ 2004-04-13 12:47 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-04-15 23:46 ` [Bug middle-end/14915] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-04-13 12:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-04-13 12:29 -------
Confirmed, Patch here: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-04/msg00777.html>.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
           Keywords|                            |patch
      Known to fail|                            |3.5.0
      Known to work|                            |3.4.0
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2004-04-13 12:29:29
               date|                            |
            Summary|Testsuite failure on mips-  |[3.5 Regression] Testsuite
                   |sgi-irix6.5 in              |failure on mips-sgi-irix6.5
                   |gcc.dg/builtins-32.c        |in gcc.dg/builtins-32.c
   Target Milestone|---                         |3.5.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14915


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/14915] [3.5 Regression] Testsuite failure on mips-sgi-irix6.5 in gcc.dg/builtins-32.c
  2004-04-11  1:06 [Bug target/14915] New: Testsuite failure on mips-sgi-irix6.5 in gcc.dg/builtins-32.c ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-04-12 20:43 ` [Bug target/14915] " wilson at specifixinc dot com
  2004-04-13 12:47 ` [Bug target/14915] [3.5 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-04-15 23:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-04-15 23:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-04-15 23:19 -------
Fixed.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14915


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-04-15 23:19 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-04-11  1:06 [Bug target/14915] New: Testsuite failure on mips-sgi-irix6.5 in gcc.dg/builtins-32.c ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-12 20:43 ` [Bug target/14915] " wilson at specifixinc dot com
2004-04-13 12:47 ` [Bug target/14915] [3.5 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-15 23:46 ` [Bug middle-end/14915] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).