From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16456 invoked by alias); 18 Apr 2004 17:35:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16440 invoked by uid 48); 18 Apr 2004 17:35:48 -0000 Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 18:02:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040418173548.16439.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040415222939.14971.tjic_gccbugs@tjic.com> References: <20040415222939.14971.tjic_gccbugs@tjic.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/14971] better error message for partial specialization of function templates requested X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg01512.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-04-18 17:35 ------- I think we have had this conversation before: should error messages be in legalese, or in a language that a typical programmer would use when talking to a colleague. I personally prefer the latter, Gaby apparently the former. However, if we continue to discuss these matters, we won't check in any patch ever. Can someone please check in whatever (s)he thinks appropriate? I'm happy to go with whatever... W. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14971