From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17939 invoked by alias); 18 Apr 2004 21:14:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17924 invoked by alias); 18 Apr 2004 21:14:50 -0000 Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 21:37:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040418211450.17923.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "hubicka at ucw dot cz" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040418155358.15004.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20040418155358.15004.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/15004] [3.4/3.5 Regression] [unit-at-a-time] no warning for unused paramater in static function X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg01549.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From hubicka at ucw dot cz 2004-04-18 21:14 ------- Subject: Re: [3.4/3.5 Regression] [unit-at-a-time] no warning for unused paramater in static function Do we realy want this to have warned? We never did so for C++ and it would be pretty expensive to throw all the function into backend just to get the warnings out. Perhaps we may want to have such warnings only for code that is really used... Honza -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15004