From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22968 invoked by alias); 18 Apr 2004 21:29:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22952 invoked by uid 48); 18 Apr 2004 21:29:13 -0000 Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 21:50:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040418212913.22951.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040418155358.15004.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20040418155358.15004.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/15004] [3.4/3.5 Regression] [unit-at-a-time] no warning for unused paramater in static function X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg01552.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-04-18 21:29 ------- Yes we want this, as if the function is too big to be inlined the function is warned about but if it is okay to be inlined it will be inlined and not warned about which right now is causing a bootstrap failure on some targets as the warning only applies to some targets only. Maybe this warning needs to be done earlier for C and C++ in that needs to be moved into the front-end or moved so that goes through some of these warnings no matter what. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15004