public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug other/15000] Support setting the default symbol visibility for ELF Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 03:18:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20040419025243.20647.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20040418032536.15000.bryner@brianryner.com> ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-04-19 02:52 ------- Niall, The reason why we told you to post it with PR 9283 is that you had filed a bug which said that visibility was broken on classes and then you went on a rampage on how it was not a dup of your bug as it was not being default, you should have filed a seperate one like this one before this mess came about. Also ELF has always had different linkage than windows file format (I forgot what is called) so the idea of everything exported was that way from the beginning, the idea it should be different is just recently. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15000
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-19 2:52 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2004-04-18 4:27 [Bug other/15000] New: " bryner at brianryner dot com 2004-04-18 8:16 ` [Bug other/15000] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-04-18 13:37 ` bryner at brianryner dot com 2004-04-19 2:59 ` s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com 2004-04-19 3:16 ` s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com 2004-04-19 3:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message] 2004-04-19 15:21 ` bryner at brianryner dot com 2004-04-19 21:29 ` s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com 2004-04-19 23:52 ` bryner at brianryner dot com 2004-04-20 1:05 ` s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com 2004-04-20 9:05 ` bryner at brianryner dot com 2004-04-22 2:42 ` s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com 2004-04-22 2:51 ` bryner at brianryner dot com 2004-04-22 18:40 ` s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com 2004-04-22 18:48 ` bryner at brianryner dot com 2004-04-22 20:37 ` s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com 2004-04-22 21:21 ` zack at codesourcery dot com 2004-04-23 5:31 ` s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com 2004-04-28 19:43 ` s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com 2004-05-03 2:36 ` bryner at brianryner dot com 2004-05-03 4:18 ` s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com 2004-05-05 6:52 ` s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com 2004-05-05 8:26 ` bryner at brianryner dot com 2004-05-05 20:38 ` s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com 2004-05-06 3:21 ` s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com 2004-05-11 17:08 ` s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com 2004-05-13 11:42 ` s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com 2004-05-30 1:43 ` s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com 2004-07-25 22:52 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-25 23:34 ` s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com 2004-07-25 23:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-07-25 23:57 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-07-26 1:31 ` s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com 2004-08-17 3:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-18 22:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-01 16:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20040419025243.20647.qmail@sources.redhat.com \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).